![]() Brain structure studies have reported structural differences between musicians and non-musicians in areas such as planum temporale ( Schlaug et al., 1995b Zatorre et al., 1998 Keenan et al., 2001), Heschl's gyrus (primary auditory cortex) ( Gaser and Schlaug, 2003 Schneider et al., 2005), Broca's area ( Sluming et al., 2002), and the inferior frontal gyrus ( Gaser and Schlaug, 2003). (1995a) found that, compared to non-musicians, musicians who began music training before the age of 7 years had a larger corpus callosum, which is a communication path connecting the left and right hemispheres of the cerebrum. In a neuroanatomical study, Schlaug et al. For example, Schellenberg (2011) revealed that musically trained children had a higher general intelligence (Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Wechsler, 1999) than did untrained children, and this difference remained when demographic variables (parents' education, parents' first language, family income, and non-musical out-of-school activities) were held constant.Ĭonsistent with these results, many brain imaging studies have revealed differences between musicians and non-musicians. Cross-sectional studies have shown that musicians are superior to non-musicians on verbal ( Chan et al., 1998 Forgeard et al., 2008 Chobert et al., 2011), spatial ( Helmbold et al., 2005 Stoesz et al., 2007), mathematical ( Cheek and Smith, 1999 Gouzouasis et al., 2007), and general cognitive abilities ( Schellenberg, 2011). Several studies have shown an association between music training and improvement in cognitive skills. We examined how instrumental music training influences more general cognitive abilities in a relatively brief period. In this context, many parents let their children learn musical instruments to try and improve their cognitive abilities through musical training ( Schellenberg, 2004). Therefore, wide ranges of brain regions are active when individuals perform music activities ( Levitin, 2006). Playing a musical instrument requires reading musical scores and translating them into motor commands, as well as performing coordinated movements and creating memory of musical phrases. The composition of music is very complex it contains tone, rhythm, harmony, melody, and other factors. If the method is applied to music lessons in schools or in the community, it may help improve children's working memory. In addition, we used an inexpensive and portable keyboard harmonica therefore, our instructional method is easy to apply in classrooms or other circumstances. The result suggests that several weeks of instrumental music training may be beneficial to improving children's working memory. However, no significant influences were found on the other cognitive tests. After the 6-week training, only the experimental group showed a significant improvement in the Digit Span test (especially in the Digit Span Backward) that measures working memory. Cognitive measurements included verbal ability, processing speed, working memory, and inhibitory control, which were administered before and after the curriculum in both groups. Different from traditional instrumental training, the curriculum did not use musical scores to emphasize creating association between sound (auditory modality) and finger movement (somato-motor system). Forty children (aged 6â8 years) were randomly assigned to either the experimental group ( n = 20), which received a 6-week (12-session) keyboard harmonica curriculum, or an untrained control group ( n = 20). Consequently, the present exploratory pilot study investigated the effect of a six-week instrumental practice program (i.e., playing the keyboard harmonica) on children's cognitive functions using a randomized controlled trial. Moreover, effects of short-term (
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |